Judge Arun Subramanian rejected Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ request for an extensive gag order in his federal sex trafficking case.
This decision comes amid mounting tensions between the hip-hop mogul’s defense team and federal prosecutors. Both sides have raised concerns over information leaks that could jeopardize the fairness of the high-profile trial.
US Weekly reports that Judge Subramanian directed prosecutors and federal agents to refrain from disclosing confidential grand jury materials. However, he did not grant the full-scale gag order requested by Diddy’s defense team. Instead, the judge’s order aims to prevent any additional leaks that might affect the case’s integrity and public perception.
The decision appears to balance both sides’ concerns. By defining specific limitations, the judge ensures that all parties understand what cannot be publicly shared.
According to the court, this is not due to any confirmed misconduct at this stage but rather a preventive measure to safeguard a fair trial process. Judge Subramanian emphasized that the order was issued to avoid any actions that might disrupt court proceedings.
Related stories
The case has gained further media traction following a New York Post article that described alleged ‘Freak Off’ parties hosted by Diddy, which reportedly involved high-profile guests and explicit activities. Diddy’s defense claims this is part of a coordinated effort by law enforcement and media to influence public opinion and erode his chances of a fair trial. The defense argues that federal agents may have leaked information inappropriately to the press, potentially tainting jury selection in advance.
Judge Subramanian acknowledged the defense’s concerns and noted that if it is confirmed that any government agent involved in the case contributed to these leaks, it would be a serious breach of court protocol. The judge kept the door open for further action, indicating that an evidentiary hearing could be held, depending on the investigation’s findings into potential leaks.
Diddy faces serious charges, including sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy, and transportation with intent to engage in prostitution. He remains detained as his legal team works to appeal the court’s decision on his bond.
The trial is currently set for May 2025, and both sides are expected to return to court in the coming months for pre-trial motions and hearings.
