Adidas has successfully defended itself against a lawsuit filed by investors over Kanye West’s controversial actions during their Yeezy partnership.
The lawsuit accused the sportswear giant of misleading investors by not disclosing the potential risks associated with West’s inappropriate behavior. An Oregon court dismissed the lawsuit.
The legal battle stemmed from Kanye West’s troubling behavior, including antisemitic and racially offensive remarks that eventually led to the termination of the Yeezy partnership in October 2022. Investors, represented by HRSA-ILA Funds, claimed that Adidas failed to protect their interests by not publicly disclosing West’s misconduct, which reportedly occurred between 2013 and 2018. They argued that this lack of transparency amounted to federal securities fraud.
However, Judge Karin J. Immergut, who presided over the case, ruled in favor of Adidas, finding that the investors’ claims lacked sufficient evidence. The judge emphasized that while West’s behavior was concerning, the primary legal issue was whether Adidas had misled investors, and she concluded that the plaintiffs had failed to prove their case.
Adidas, in its defense, argued that it was not obligated to publicly reveal Kanye West’s misconduct and that its existing risk disclosures were adequate. The company highlighted that its contracts typically include clauses allowing for the termination of partnerships in cases of improper or unethical conduct—a clause that Adidas ultimately invoked when it ended its relationship with West.
The lawsuit was filed shortly after a 2023 exposé by The New York Times, which detailed numerous allegations of misconduct by West during his time working with Adidas. Despite the serious nature of these claims, Judge Immergut’s ruling indicates that Adidas’s disclosures to investors were not misleading, as they did not imply that West or any other partner had never engaged in problematic behavior.